Re: [PATCH 3/5] hwclock: final usage() strings slice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/04/2017 10:55 AM, Ruediger Meier wrote:
> Yes this is nice because easy to count that no usage output is longer 
> than 80 chars. But I guess there are too many different opinions about 
> these stylish things. I'd also like to have just one string and only 
> one printf command for all options (like mkfs.cramfs.c). But this may 
> cause more work for translators each time we add a new option. Don't 
> know if that would be a real problem.

In coreutils, we got the feedback from the translators that they'd prefer
one string per option.  Otherwise, changes are harder to track for them.

Have a nice day,
Berny

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux