It is reasonable to assume use of --no-act means one wants to always see
what would have happen if rename is done. To say same slightly differently,
if there is sn use case for silent rename --no-act run I cannot think one.
Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@xxxxxx>
---
misc-utils/rename.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/misc-utils/rename.c b/misc-utils/rename.c
index c1b9d4a0e..502e888d7 100644
--- a/misc-utils/rename.c
+++ b/misc-utils/rename.c
@@ -154,11 +154,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "vsVhn", longopts, NULL)) != -1)
switch (c) {
- case 'v':
- verbose = 1;
- break;
case 'n':
noact = 1;
+ /* fallthrough */
+ case 'v':
+ verbose = 1;
break;
case 's':
do_rename = do_symlink;
--
2.13.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
