On 03/18/2017 08:41 PM, Sami Kerola wrote: > On 17 March 2017 at 17:47, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Description: utilities for interfacing with sysfs. >> >> Background: unmaintained since ten years, included in >> enterprise distributions and widely used with plenty of >> downloads: https://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-diag/files/sysfsutils/stats/timeline?dates=2003-07-01++to+2017-03-17 >> >> >> $HOME: https://linux-diag.sf.net/Sysfsutils.html <--- HTTPS broken!! >> $HOME: http://linux-diag.sf.net/Sysfsutils.html >> Source code: https://sf.net/projects/linux-diag/files/sysfsutils/ > > Good proposal, and after quick test to migrate sysfsutils to > util-linux this seems > do-able. But before proceeding any further I want to hear from Karel and old > sysfsutils maintainer if the project merge what is wanted. > > git://github.com/kerolasa/lelux-utiliteetit.git sysfsutils > > If yes next steps: > > 1. polish libsysfs, add for example .sym file > 2. polish systool, add translations, and other standard util-linux > conventions, such as atexit hook, xmalloc usage, and so on > 3. figure out what should be done with dlist_test, get_device, > get_driver, and get_module > 4. add tests, and make _PART_SYS_SYSTEM stuff work > 5. without a doubt something other as well > 6. send a pull month or two later Cced the rest of the sysfsutils crew. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
