Am 10.02.2017 um 12:05 schrieb Yuri Chornoivan:
> diff --git a/misc-utils/look.c b/misc-utils/look.c
> index 93c388e..bb0d965 100644
> --- a/misc-utils/look.c
> +++ b/misc-utils/look.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ look(char *front, char *back)
> int ch;
> char *readp, *writep;
>
> - /* Reformat string string to avoid doing it multiple times later. */
> + /* Reformat string to avoid doing it multiple times later. */
> if (dflag) {
> for (readp = writep = string; (ch = *readp++) != 0;) {
> if (isalnum(ch) || isblank(ch))
Actually I don't think this is a word repetition. It looks to me like
it's really talking about "string string" - the string held in the
variable named "string".
> diff --git a/sys-utils/hwclock.c b/sys-utils/hwclock.c
> index 21caeb2..e561859 100644
> --- a/sys-utils/hwclock.c
> +++ b/sys-utils/hwclock.c
> @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ display_time(const bool hclock_valid, struct timeval hwctime)
> * runnable by issuing the command "date" to the /bin/sh shell. That means
> * in must be in the current PATH.
> *
> - * If anything goes wrong (and many things can), we return return code 10
> + * If anything goes wrong (and many things can), we return code 10
> * and arbitrary *time_p. Otherwise, return code is 0 and *time_p is valid.
> */
> static int interpret_date_string(const char *date_opt, time_t * const time_p)
Nor is this, as it talks about the return code that will be returned.
Regards,
Tilman
--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@xxxxxxx
Bonn, Germany
Nous, on a des fleurs et des bougies pour nous protéger.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
