On 02/13/2017 08:04 AM, Karel Zak wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:24:38AM +0000, Sami Kerola wrote: >> On 10 February 2017 at 20:58, J William Piggott <elseifthen@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> This branch adds the parse_datetime module from the gnu >>> portability library. >> >> Assuming gnulib integration is wanted then replacing bootstrap process, >> deduplicating pieces of code in include/ with gnulib versions would be in >> todo list. For example why one would keep util-linux xmalloc() when gnulib >> provides the same. Same is true for close_stdout(), and many other >> functions. >> >> While code reuse is good idea I have doubts if this really is direction >> where to go to. > > I have no doubts, I'm sure that we don't want it. It's overkill. > I expected that. That's okay, I learned a lot from making it work. Would you consider a single file: sys-utils/hwclock-parse-datetime.c? I don't want to waste time rewriting it if the answer is no. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
