Re: stable/v2.29.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:32:20AM +0100, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 01/18/2017 02:12 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> > The branch stable/v2.29 contains what I want to release as v2.29.1.
> 
> General question:
> Is it worth dealing with maintenance branches in the upstream repo?
> I mean, downstream projects can cherry-pick fixes and improvements
> to their own needs anyway.  So I think having one upstream mainline
> would be sufficient.  WDYT?

 I use the branches to create maintenance releases (tarballs), e.g.
 v2.29.1.
 
 The goal is to minimize number of patches in downstream packages. So I
 guess downstream are happy to have .1 and .2 releases.

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux