On Thursday 17 November 2016, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 11/17/2016 03:10 AM, Ruediger Meier wrote: > > Just make the script more readable. Nobody is using 10 years old > > git. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ruediger Meier <ruediger.meier@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tools/git-version-gen | 21 --------------------- > > 1 file changed, 21 deletions(-) > > Is there any particular reason not to sync from latest > upstream (again)? > > http://g.sv.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/build-aux/git-version-gen I only want to fix some cosmetical issues regarding our version numbers. Don't want to risk making things worse. This particulary removed fallback was probably never used in UL and probably broken since we've added our special "-rc* handling. Regarding gnulib upstream, IMO their git-version-gen is overengineered and too complicated. We don't need any of the new options --prefix, --fallback, --help or --version. BTW the real upstream would be https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/GIT-VERSION-GEN which is simple to understand and easy to add small project-specific changes. cu, Rudi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
