On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:58:25AM +0100, Ruediger Meier wrote:
> On Sunday 06 November 2016, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> > So what happens now when losetup is fed with ""?
> > Wouldn't it be better to handle the error instead?
>
> Actually the failure is generally handled in terms that the test will
> fail and exit 1.
This is the basic idea of the tests; it would be nice to keep it
simple and stupid :-)
> the whole --help output on usage errors. I really hate that auto-help
> feature. Don't understand why we are doing that instead of just
> printing "unkown option" or "missing argument".
I'd like to change it for v2.30.
Optionally, it would be also nice to have a way how to suggest the
correct option on typos. I like the way how git react on typos:
$ git cxmmit
git: 'cxmmit' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.
Did you mean this?
commit
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
