Re: [PATCH 0/3] btrfs-safe implementation of -oloop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:21:59PM +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> As it was discussed in LKML[1], kernel has no way to detect backing
> file data changes if multiple loop devices have the same backing file.
> 
> Exactly this happened if -oloop is used multiple times with the same
> source.
> 
> It could not happen in past, but with introduction of btrfs sub-volumes
> it has a perfectly legal use cases.
> 
> This patch set introduces a new behavior of -oloop:
> 
> First check, whether the same backing file with the same offset is
> already used. If yes, reuse already initialized loop device.
> 
> If not, initialize another loop device.

 Applied, thanks.

> - If the same backing file is already used for a loop device with
>   correct offset, but incorrect sizelimit, there is no solution. The
>   current implementation does not check for it.

 We need a warning/error for this.

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux