Re: [PATCH] docs: optional option arguments should be long-only

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 16 Apr 2016, Benno Schulenberg wrote:

> 
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016, at 17:23, Sami Kerola wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> > > > +will use
> > > > +.I n
> > > > +as option argument of
> > > > +.I -n
> > > 
> > > .B n  and  .B -o
> > 
> > https://github.com/kerolasa/lelux-utiliteetit/commit/398c6547338778cec441d8a0503d0598517b87fe
> 
> You still missed the -n.  That last -n needs to be -o.
> 
> 
> /me hears Sami slap forehead.  :)

Some claimed the slap was heard all the way in Czechia.

> After a second look:
> s/while later/while the latter/
> s/.B -n/.BR -o ./
> s/option.  So/So/
> s/short form/short forms/

Thank you again Benno, here is the lates.

https://github.com/kerolasa/lelux-utiliteetit/commit/326c5c93b917a623f346155c8b3438b379d9fd60

-- 
Sami Kerola
http://www.iki.fi/kerolasa/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux