Re: v2.29 plan: kill mtab

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 09:35:41PM -0700, Robby Workman wrote:
> Karel Zak wrote:
> 
> > libmount supports three scenarios:
> > 
> > 1) regular classic /etc/mtab
> > 
> > 2) /etc/mtab symlink to /proc/self/mount -- in this case libmount uses
> >    /proc/self/mountinfo and /run/mount/utab
> > 
> > The current default is to detect symlink and on-the-fly switch
> > between 1) and 2).
> > 
> > 3) --enable-libmount-force-mountinfo -- don't care about the symlink
> >    and always use /proc/self/mountinfo. This is robust solution required
> >    for example by systemd, because unfortunately sometimes people use
> >    broken stuff (init scripts, tools, etc.) which removes the symlink.
> > 
> > 
> > I'd like to make 3) default, the question is what with mtab code:
> > 
> >    a) #ifdef all mtab code (and add --enable-libmount-support-mtab)
> > 
> >    b) remove mtab support at all (because it's evil and horrible code)
> > 
> > Comments?
> 
> 
> We still use SysV init because it suits our needs just fine, and we
> have no plans to migrate to systemd in the foreseeable future, so
> we don't have any other compelling reason to use anything other than
> classic /etc/mtab. As such, we'd certainly appreciate, at the very
> least, leaving the mtab support in util-linux.

This discussion is really not about init, but about mtab that is
broken by design. 

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux