On Monday 04 April 2016, Karel Zak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 02:21:00AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 09:35:27AM +0100, Sami Kerola wrote: > > > These options are expecting an argument, and the long options > > > struct already required them. > > > > Good catch, but deadline and runtime should be optional arguments > > (it seems I have merged wrong version of my patch:-( > > Sorry, didn't read the patch correctly. You're right. Applied, > thanks. BTW I like the coreutils convention that new options with optional arguments should be long options only. This is less confusing for the users. cu, Rudi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
