Re: [PATCH 0/2] ipcs: more robust and compatible /proc parsing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 18 March 2016, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:49:16PM +0100, Ruediger Meier wrote:
> > From: Ruediger Meier <ruediger.meier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > If this looks ok for shm then we could also add similar patches for
> > sem and msg.
>
> Seems good, I'll wait for complete set of the patches, ok?

For msg and sem we don't have compatibility problems or bugs in real 
life but only these _potential_ fscanf issues. Not so important for 
2.28.

I would like to do that later in a project wide scanf review but without 
hurry.

cu,
Rudi 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux