On Thu, Mar 17, 2016, at 18:18, Ruediger Meier wrote:
> Could you show us
> $ cat /proc/sysvipc/shm
key shmid perms size cpid lpid nattch uid gid cuid cgid atime dtime ctime
0 131072 1600 393216 1409 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201259 0 1458201259
0 163841 1600 393216 1413 19472 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458231784 1458231784 1458201259
0 196610 1600 393216 1399 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201260 0 1458201260
0 229379 1600 393216 1399 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201260 0 1458201260
0 262148 1600 393216 1419 1474 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201262 1458201262 1458201261
0 294917 1600 393216 1419 1474 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201262 1458201262 1458201261
0 327686 1600 393216 1388 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201262 0 1458201262
0 360455 1600 393216 1416 2127 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458204570 1458204570 1458201265
0 393224 1600 393216 1424 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201265 0 1458201265
0 425993 1600 393216 1490 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201268 0 1458201268
0 458762 1600 393216 1495 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201268 0 1458201268
0 491531 1600 393216 1508 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201268 0 1458201268
0 524300 1600 393216 1497 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201268 0 1458201268
0 557069 1600 393216 1405 18482 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458215908 1458215908 1458201269
0 589838 1600 393216 1492 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201270 0 1458201270
0 622607 1600 393216 1493 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201273 0 1458201273
0 655376 1600 393216 1496 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201274 0 1458201274
0 688145 1600 393216 1417 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458201282 0 1458201282
0 720914 1600 393216 1413 19472 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458231784 1458231784 1458201449
-60920149 1081363 644 12 10036 0 0 1000 1000 1000 1000 0 0 1458215137
0 1114132 1600 393216 1417 921 2 1000 1000 1000 1000 1458215476 0 1458215476
> Generally I think we should make a statement about "what is the minimum
> kernel version" for util-linux.
A statement. And let the tests check the version and print
a warning in case it's too old.
> Two years ago I decided for myself that
> I should fix bugs for newer kernels first. On the other hand 2.6.32
> would have been worth to support because it was officially maintained
> from 2009 until last month!
I'm not expecting you to fix things. It's just nice to put
things in a harsher environment and see how they hold up. :)
> I guess the kernel syscall does not return error thus our fallocate
> succeed but the file is empty. It's a kernel bug we can't fix. Or
> should we add a stat() call to validate the syscall?
That sounds like a good idea: check, and double check.
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Accessible with your email software
or over the web
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
