On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:21:25PM +0100, Sami Kerola wrote:
> I do not think cal(1) should implement all of the possible week numbering
> alternatives.
Yes, it seems the current US mess is enough.
> Sami Kerola (4):
> cal: correct gregorian week numbering
> tests: cal: update Gregorian week numbers
^^^^^^^^^^^^
not sent
> cal: replace magic constants with symbolical values
> cal: check biggest week number correctly when highlighting
>
> misc-utils/cal.c | 102 +++---
> tests/expected/cal/bigyearw | 156 ++++-----
> tests/expected/cal/colorw | 48 +--
> tests/expected/cal/jan1753 | 12 +-
> tests/expected/cal/sep1752w | 148 ++++----
> tests/expected/cal/weekarg | 60 ++--
> tests/expected/cal/weeknum | 816 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> tests/ts/cal/weekarg | 26 ++
this diffstat does not match with patches you send to the list. It
seems you forgot to send updated tests. I have updated the tests
manually. Please, git-pull & review. Thanks.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
