On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:54:02PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 09:37:48AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:32:07AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:15:05AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote: > > > > sys-utils/lscpu.c | 3 +++ > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > Hello Karel, > > > > just a general question, from my understanding the the summary output > > is supposed to be human readable. I'm not sure how a 500+ character > > line fits into this. > > It's last line printed by lscpu, so terminal wraps it and from my > point of view it's still pretty human readable. > > > At least it doesn't fit to the current layout of the summary output, > > but maybe that's just my impression. > > Any suggestion how to improve it? > > I think that provide incomplete info and force people to read also > /proc/cpuinfo is bad idea. Ok, I was just wondering what the general "guide line" for stuff like this is. When I applied the patch and saw the output it looked strange to me and it didn't fit to the rest of the output. However that's probably just my personal taste ;) Anyway, no further objections. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
