Re: [PATCH] hwclock: flush stdout in hwclock -c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Alexey,

 I've been advocating for the removal of the compare function. One of my
 justifications for doing so is that it has been broken from day one and
 therefore nobody can be using for anything.

 So could you tell me how you are using it, and what useful purpose it is
 serving for you?

Thanks
 William

On 04/16/2015 11:26 AM, Alexey Galakhov wrote:
> This allows using hwclock -c in automated test scripts that parse
> its output line-by-line. The standard output is flushed before
> each 10 second delay.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Galakhov <agalakhov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  sys-utils/hwclock.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/sys-utils/hwclock.c b/sys-utils/hwclock.c
> index e1e5816..4cdb2ea 100644
> --- a/sys-utils/hwclock.c
> +++ b/sys-utils/hwclock.c
> @@ -1532,6 +1532,7 @@ static int compare_clock (const bool utc, const bool local_opt)
>  			printf("hw-time      system-time         freq-offset-ppm   tick\n");
>  			printf("%10.0f   %10.6f\n", (double) time1_hw, time1_sys);
>  		}
> +		fflush(stdout);
>  		sleep(10);
>  	}
>  
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux