Re: unshare(1) --propagation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 02:07:25PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> It might surprise a few folks that 
> "--propagation shared" and "--propagation off" are do not do
> the same thing..  But otherwise as far as functionality this looks
> fine.
> 
> I will suggest instead of calling it "--propagation off" you
> call it "--propagation unchanged".

 Good idea, changed.

> I also think --propagation private is much less likely to burn folks.
> 
> Of course the flip side is that as soon as they finish prototyping and
> start putting their logic in an application they will get burned.  But
> there is only so much a person can do.  And "--propagation private" is
> a common enough desire I think it makes sense.  Especially since
> "--propagation private" is what any sane person will expect to happen.

 Yep, thanks for review.

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux