Re: tty[1-6]: colors a negative accessibility/usability trend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...> writes:

> 
> Karel Zak, le Thu 12 Feb 2015 14:21:10 +0100, a écrit :
> > For example for fedora I will keep the colors enabled, because it's
> > current distribution policy.
> 
> But all distributions need to be accessible.  It is a per-user
> preference, not a per-task or per-distribution preference.  So upstream
> at least needs to provide ways to configure it per user, and downstream
> provide a uniform way to configure the various shipped tools.

>From the idea in the blog post
(http://karelzak.blogspot.de/2014/04/terminal-colorsd.html), the user side
seems to be covered with the override cascade of /etc/terminal-colors.d/ <-
$HOME/.config/terminal-colors.d/ <- --color=X.  And the distribution side
would be covered by setting defaults in /etc/terminal-colors.d/ and then
allowing per-user settings in $HOME/.config/terminal-colors.d/ via a GUI
tool.  The tools side should be easy enough to implement using this
standardised system.  Is there a deficiency in the design?  Apart from maybe
a way to enable rather than just disable.

Also, should this concept be discussed with the freedesktop.org people
(http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg) for possibly defining a
new de facto standard?

Cheers,

Edward


P.S.  For reference, and cross-linking, this was first brought up on the
Mageia dev mailing list:

https://ml.mageia.org/l/arc/dev/2015-02/msg00408.html
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.mageia.devel/43249��.n��������+%����;��w��{.n�����)��)�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f





[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux