On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 06:15:01PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote: > > $ ln -s setarch foo echo ".so man8/setarch.8" > foo.8 > $ ./foo --version > foo from util-linux 2.25.634-8501-dirty > > But util-linux does not contain any program called "foo": > > $ man foo > No manual entry for foo > > Shouldn't --version report the name of the original program > instead of the name of the binary? Just like the last line > of the --help output does: > > $ ./foo --help | tail -1 > For more details see setarch(8). but we usually have man pages for the distributed symlinks :-) try "man i386" Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> http://karelzak.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
