On 11/24/2014 09:03 PM, Lutz Vieweg wrote: > On 11/24/2014 08:43 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote: >>> Then there's another idea: The device is a SATA SSD, but attached >>> to a SAS2 expander chip on the backplane of the server (LSI SAS2X28) >>> which in turn is connected to a LSI SAS HBA 9207-4i4e. >>> could maybe, just maybe, the TRIM command be modified wrongly >>> on its way through these / their respective drivers? >> >> Yeah, it is a known issue with LSI firmware. >> >> http://osdir.com/ml/dm-devel/2013-09/msg00126.html > > I must admit that I have difficulties understanding what this > email thread is ultimately telling: Does it mean LSI firmware > actually tampers with TRIM commands such that they would discard > other ranges than those intended? (In which case using TRIM > over any such LSI device would be very dangerous.) > Or does is mean the capabilities of some SSDs to discard data > are mis-reported? And if so, in the sense that the kernel might > not be able to discard data at all, or in the sense that data > is discarded, but the kernel sends additional commands that the > device cannot understand? > > After all, if it's just an annoying error message that I can > ignore, I wouldn't mind. But if TRIM via LSI means "data loss", > I would of course have to take measures against this... > It just tries to trim one sector more than the device actually has. So as far as I can tell it is harmless. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
