Re: RFC hwclock: refactoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello JWP,

On Sat, Nov 22, 2014, at 22:20, JWP wrote:
> For example, do we need a workaround for the 1994 Award BIOS
> bug?

In my opinion machines with that BIOS are too old.  So no.
Also because I wondered a few times about this phrase:

>               hwclock warns you that you probably need --badyear  whenever  it
>               finds your Hardware Clock set to 1994 or 1995.

Nowhere in the source of hwclock can I find this warning.  But it
has been there in 2000, because this user reports having gotten it:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.lang.basic/ilp_6HwLvZE/sE1nBoiD_LcJ

Since no one ever complained that the above phrase in the man page
is incorrect, it most likely means that no one uses such machines
any more.

Benno

-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux