Re: [PATCH 1/7] hwclock: hctosys drift compensation II

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14 October 2014 10:03, Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Maybe it would be better to think about whole code refactoring as it's
> horrible code. It's probably last so horrible code in util-linux.

Along with more(1). I started to look this refactoring task, and it
seems reimplementation would be best option. Does someone fancy a
programming challenge?

Few disk utils, cramfs, bfs, and minix related, could also be improved
or marked deprecated. I am hoping for later.

-- 
Sami Kerola
http://www.iki.fi/kerolasa/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux