Re: [RFC PATCH] hwclock: --offset: Use offset instead of writing clock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/07/2014 08:48 AM, Noé RUBINSTEIN wrote:
>> Sure, hwclock already has the ability to track the offset between the
>> Hardware Clock and the System Clock(which presumably is the 'correct' time).
> ...but this information is recorded only when setting the hardware
> clock, which is impossible on some (arguably buggy) targets.

I would think we should fix that. What hardware is it that hwclock cannot
set the Hardware Clock?

> 
>> With my patch, hctosys will include the offset when setting the System
>> Clock. Which is the functionality you want, right?
> Nearly.
> 
> I guess in order for the use-case I want to be possible we would need
> an option for --systohc/--set to modify the adjtime file, but not to
> touch the hardware clock.

Well, we could (re)calculate the drift factor even if setting the Hardware
Clock fails, or have an option to (re)calculate without setting the HW Clock.
I am willing to write such a patch if Mr. Zak approves.


> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux