On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:52:36PM +0600, Gennady Kovshenin wrote: > I like the format=auto idea. But we can keep it to just the number of > columns instead of a full CxR format. It would be the best to talk about number of months ;-) > i.e. format=2 (2x6), format=3 (3x4), format=4 (4x3), and so on. > perhaps the parameter should be called --columns/-c instead of format. > We can either have an additional auto value to the format, or have it > be on by default. > Having auto on by default means breaking compatibility. Some users > might be parsing output expecting the default 3x4 view in place and if > we abruptly change this to be stretched automatically their scripts > might break. > > Any thoughts on the above? --format vs. --columns? And the default > value thereof. Or something else --horizontal-months[=<num>|auto] and think we can support arbitrary <num> in range 1-12. Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> http://karelzak.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html