On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:52:36PM +0600, Gennady Kovshenin wrote:
> I like the format=auto idea. But we can keep it to just the number of
> columns instead of a full CxR format.
It would be the best to talk about number of months ;-)
> i.e. format=2 (2x6), format=3 (3x4), format=4 (4x3), and so on.
> perhaps the parameter should be called --columns/-c instead of format.
> We can either have an additional auto value to the format, or have it
> be on by default.
> Having auto on by default means breaking compatibility. Some users
> might be parsing output expecting the default 3x4 view in place and if
> we abruptly change this to be stretched automatically their scripts
> might break.
>
> Any thoughts on the above? --format vs. --columns? And the default
> value thereof.
Or something else --horizontal-months[=<num>|auto]
and think we can support arbitrary <num> in range 1-12.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
