Re: [PATCH] tests: allow non-inotify tailf to keep up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 02:21:15PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 01:59:23PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 01:36:01PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > > For such tests coreutils uses a helper function
> > > to apply a truncated exponential backoff,
> > > to run quickly in the common case, but also
> > > delay longer if necessary. See retry_delay_() at:
> 
> Thanks for the pointer!
> 
> > > 
> > > http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=blob;f=init.cfg;h=725ee121;hb=HEAD#l608
> > 
> >  Andreas? (hint: send a new patch :-))
> 
> I fail to see how this is useful here. We either need a short delay (using
> inotify) or a longer delay (not using inotify). All other steps seems
> pointless to me, even harmful in non-inotify case!

 OK, merged. Maybe someone will provide a better solution later.

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux