setarch question, uname -m

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I wonder whether it would be possible (and useful) to always support
  setarch $(uname -m) ...
like we are trying in tests/ts/misc/setarch.

Currently we only support these hardcoded transistions where a lot of archs are missing.
Couldn't we just add something like
 {PER_LINUX$word_size, un.machine, un.machine}
to transitions dynamically at runtime? Or wouldn't it make any sense?

cu,
Rudi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux