On 20 May 2014 11:02, Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > BTW, setterm still need our love: Hi Karel and others, Here is the remaining setterm(1) love before release 2.25. > * usage() contains only options, but no any description In this patch set, see 0001. > * it would be nice to have long options (--term rather than -term) > in the man page Hold on, do you mean what I did in commit fb27f91cac9702ad1858d782dd840d5868547423 > * nowhere (in man page) is info that --long options are supported > since v2.25 (and for backward compatibility is better to use > "-foo" rather than "--foo") In this patch set, see 0003. Sami Kerola (4): setterm: add usage() descriptions docs: setterm.1 add missing options to manual page and remove duplicate docs: setterm.1 add options compatibility note docs: setterm.1 clean up manual page groff style term-utils/setterm.1 | 291 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ term-utils/setterm.c | 69 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-) -- 1.9.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html