On 20 May 2014 11:02, Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> BTW, setterm still need our love:
Hi Karel and others,
Here is the remaining setterm(1) love before release 2.25.
> * usage() contains only options, but no any description
In this patch set, see 0001.
> * it would be nice to have long options (--term rather than -term)
> in the man page
Hold on, do you mean what I did in commit
fb27f91cac9702ad1858d782dd840d5868547423
> * nowhere (in man page) is info that --long options are supported
> since v2.25 (and for backward compatibility is better to use
> "-foo" rather than "--foo")
In this patch set, see 0003.
Sami Kerola (4):
setterm: add usage() descriptions
docs: setterm.1 add missing options to manual page and remove
duplicate
docs: setterm.1 add options compatibility note
docs: setterm.1 clean up manual page groff style
term-utils/setterm.1 | 291 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
term-utils/setterm.c | 69 ++++++------
2 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
