On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:43:46AM +0200, Ruediger Meier wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 May 2014, Karel Zak wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 03:42:29PM +0000, Ruediger Meier wrote:
> > > const int hv_vendor_pci[] = {
> > > @@ -574,6 +577,51 @@ read_hypervisor_cpuid(struct lscpu_desc *desc)
> > > static void
> > > read_hypervisor_cpuid(struct lscpu_desc *desc
> > > __attribute__((__unused__))) {
> > > +#ifdef __powerpc__
> > > + /* powerpc:
> > > + * IBM iSeries: legacy, if /proc/iSeries exists, its
> > > para-virtualized on top of OS/400 + * IBM pSeries: always has a
> > > hypervisor
> > > + * if partition-name is "full", its kind of
> > > "bare-metal": full-system-partition + * otherwise its
> > > some partition created by Hardware Management Console + *
> > > in any case, its always some sort of HVM + * KVM: "linux,kvm"
> > > in /hypervisor/compatible indicates a KVM guest + * Xen: not in
> > > use, not detected
> > > + */
> >
> > I don't see relation between this code and CPU ID. Why this codes
> > is with in read_hypervisor_cpuid() ?
> >
> > Wouldn't be better to add read_powerpc_hypervisor() and call it
> > from read_hypervisor()?
>
> Yes, I would call it like this, ok?
OK.
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
