Karel, On Apr 25 10:21, Jesper Dahl Nyerup wrote: > This could involve: > > 1. Adding a daemon next to script(1) and scriptreplay(1), eg. > scriptcollect(1), to be in the receiving end of the traffic, optionally > handling the timing functionality, and finally storing data in the same > manner script(1) would. > > 2. Optionally linking against some crypto library to avoid putting > users' console data on the wire in clear text. > > Ideally we'd like to upstream any changes we make, and this post serves > as an attempt to gauge the mood and ask for guidance as to which > direction you guys think we should take our efforts. Do you think functionality like this belongs in script(1) et al., and do you think you'd accept the patches, if they look sane? J. -- Jesper Dahl Nyerup Systems Engineer One.com, nyerup@xxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
