Re: libblkid: Idea to force given cached entry to be invalidated?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 04:29:06PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >>So if someone (maybe insane) use mknod to create as block device file and
> >>use 'btrfs dev del' on the newly created
> >>block device file, libblkid will still be unable to detect the change since
> >>the ctime/mtime of block device file in /dev/
> >>does not change.
> >Not sure if I understand, it would be nice to have complete example.
> >
> >     Karel
> >
> Sorry for my poor English.
> Use /dev/sda6(major 8, minor 6) as an example.
> ------
> # stat  /dev/sda6
>   File: '/dev/sda6'
>   Size: 0             Blocks: 0          IO Block: 4096   block special file
> Device: 5h/5d    Inode: 7289        Links: 1     Device type: 8,6
> Access: (0660/brw-rw----)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: (    6/ disk)
> Access: 2014-04-17 12:30:08.981732698 +0800
> Modify: 2014-04-17 12:30:08.981732698 +0800
> Change: 2014-04-17 12:30:08.981732698 +0800
>                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  Birth: -
> # mknod sda6 b 8 6
> # mkfs.ext4 ./sda6 <<< Not /dev/sda6

 Ah... it's too crazy to support this scenario :-)

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux