On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:23:40AM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
> You really want to tell the user that they aren't going to be able to
> write up front.
>
> I have to say this function was already broken. If the caller
> requests write access and that fails, then the call should fail. It
> should *not* automatically fall back to read-only without giving any
> indication to the caller. If the caller wants to retry for read only,
> then it can, and print a warning letting the user know it has switched
> to ready only.
I agree, implemented. The function does not fallback to read-only mode
now -- all has to be controlled by caller.
Thanks Maciej for your report!
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
