On 7 March 2014 04:44, Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:22:52PM +0000, Sami Kerola wrote: >> This pull request has four patches that will allow a builder to disable >> all commands. > > Note that I don't silently ignore these patches, Hi Karel, I know you don't, and it was expected this is not the usual patch set that gets review and comments immediately. > but I'd like to play > with it later and try to provide better granularity, maybe something > like > > --enable-util=<list> > --disable-util=<list> > --enable-all > --disable-all > > where <list> is comma separated list of the utils names (we already > use thing like this for static programs), then we can avoid huge > number of --enable-* options. The --enable-util=<item1,item2> sounds much better approach. I wonder if this approach could be converted to reasonably reusable m4 definition, resulting to deprecation of various command specific disable/enables. -- Sami Kerola http://www.iki.fi/kerolasa/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
