Re: [PATCH] uuidd: use pkg-config to find systemd-deamon support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8 January 2014 09:21, Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 01:44:07PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tuesday 07 January 2014 05:19:35 Karel Zak wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 10:55:35AM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> > > >> We already have such a cyclic dependency, since udevd depends on
>> > > >> libblkid+libuuid, and findmnt (from util-linux) depends on libudev.
>> > > >>
>> > > >  .. and nobody complains, good point :-) Thanks!
>> > > >
>> > > >     Karel
>> > >
>> > > Actually, now that I know you care about these things, I am complaining.
>> > >
>> >  :-)))
>> >  :
>> > > It has caused me (minor) trouble once already.
>> >
>> >  It's possible (first time) to compile util-linux without libudev,
>> >  compile systemd/udevd and then again recompile util-linux with
>> >  libudev.
>> >
>> >  IMHO libudev is very useful for findmnt and lsblk to get info about
>> >  devices.
>> >
>> >  Note that uuidd is absolutely unnecessary if you don't have huge SAP
>> >  installation (-- it means unnecessary for 99% of the all Linux users).
>>
>> on a semi-related matter, it'd be nice if we could easily build util-linux
>> such that we only get the libraries.  the plethora of configure flags that
>> control utils is a nightmare to manage, and i'm not sure there's a flag for
>> every utility (i haven't checked myself, so i could easily be wrong).
>
> not yet ;-)
>
>> if that were in play, the circular loop would be easy to address -- build
>> util-linux once just for its libs, then udev/systemd, then util-linux again.
>
> Yep, I know about the pain... I guess it would be enough to have
> something like
>
>  ./configure --disable-all-builds --enable-libblkid
>
> where --enable/disable-all-builds controls the default of the
> enable_<name>= variables (the current default is usually "check")
> in configure.
>
> I'll try to implement it later (I'm working on new cfdisk now) -- or
> maybe some volunteer...? :-)

I could try to fiddle around with autotools in next days/weeks.

The one thing I am thinking to change immediately is
's/--disable-all-builds/--enable-minimal/'.  Unfortunately, due I'm just
a random contributor without distribution packaging experience at all I
will need few hints from real pros.  Most important question being what
the minimal should include?  I did think that option could be
--enable-libaries-only, but is that too minimal to be practical?

p.s.  Karel, the consider the cal(1) enhancements being temporarily
postponed.  Well, they weren't import anyway, so IMHO not a big loss.

-- 
Sami Kerola
http://www.iki.fi/kerolasa/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux