On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 05:02:30PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> The first two patches properly pluralize two error messages. The third
> patch makes some tiny grammar, style and punctuation tweaks to a few
> error messages. The fourth marks the filedescriptor as optional for the
> -C option of fsck, and adds some missing markup to the man page, corrects
> a word there, and expands an abbreviation for clarity. The ninth patch
> then slices the help text of fsck into single options, for ease of
> translation maintenance. (I hadn't seen Sami's survey request nor its
> results until today -- his request had landed in my spam folder. :|
> But I fully agree with the outcome.)
>
> The fifth patch corrects the description of the --sysroot option of lscpu,
> and the tenth patch then slices the text into single options.
>
> The sixth patch removes the incorrect spaces from "-e [=list]" and
> "-p [=list]" in the lscpu manpage, normalizes the spacing of the text,
> and corrects a word here and there. The seventh patch normalizes
> the help text of mkfs (using <type> instead of TYPE, for example),
> marks that -t and fs-options are independent (a distinction that has
> gone missing in a commit a year and a half ago), and slices it into
> strips. The eighth patch standardizes the version reporting to:
> "program from util-linux-x.xx.x".
It seems that Sami, you and I did the same changes. Please, can you
pull from upstream repo and rebase this set of the patches?
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
