On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:36:55PM +0000, Sami Kerola wrote:
> There is no reason why 'ipcmk -Q -Q' would should not work, so allow that
> and any other combination of switches such as:
Well, we can implement whatever, but does it make sense? How many
people look for the feature?
> ipcmk -Q -Q -p 700 -M 42 -Q -S 13
>
> The behavior of '-p' changed in this commit.
Unacceptable, backwardly incompatible change.
Sami, if you want to help then try to write tests, many many utils
and features are still not covered by regression tests (hexdump,
lsblk, ipc*, dmesg, blockdev, utmpdump, tailf, ....).
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
