Re: [PATCH 1/4] docs: mention Open Group requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sami Kerola <kerolasa@xxxxxx> writes:

> +	conflict with the latest standard.  For example it is
> +	recommendable not to add short command line options before they
> +	are part of standard.  Introducing new short options is
> +	acceptable.

Should that second "short" be "long"?

-- 
Adam Sampson <ats@xxxxxxxxx>                         <http://offog.org/>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux