On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:03:01PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> if you were to do something like:
> int foo = 10;
> usleep(foo++);
>
> this define macro would misbehave because it expands x twice. not that the
> current code base does.
Yes, I moved the fallback to c.h as inline function this morning.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
