On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:05:43AM -0400, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > I honestly don't see much difference between doing it before or > after GPT, since all the other labels need to be adapted anyway. I see a difference. Why we need struct fdisk_guid in struct where we define DOS partition types? Why there is {0} everywhere? Do you want to remove all these changes later? Anyway, I have no problem to write the patch to split part types to separate per-label tables :-) It also seems that you're introduce a new hex codes for GPT partition types. It means that you want to use int16_t to address types defined by UUIDs. Is it good idea? Would be better to address the types by numbers <1-N> as printed in the menu or directly by UUIDs? Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> http://karelzak.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html