On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:44:09AM +0200, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 11:06 +0200, Petr Uzel wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 08:15:17PM +0200, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > Well for now this seemed like the saner way of proceeding, but yes, I'm > definitely up for debating as I don't like the idea of overwriting the > discovery. Perhaps an extra parameter in the initialization context for > flags. Or better separate function(s) for setting and getting that flag and custom sector_size to/from the context structure. > IIRC there are other similar issues that we'll have to deal with > soon - like user passed CHS. Petr -- Petr Uzel IRC: ptr_uzl @ freenode
Attachment:
pgpLa40Igov15.pgp
Description: PGP signature
