Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> ... use for() naturally instead.
> - for (tmp = pathcp; ; tmp = NULL) {
> - tok = strtok_r(tmp, ":", &key);
> - if (!tok)
> - break;
> -
> + for (tmp = pathcp; tok = strtok_r(tmp, ":", &key); tmp = NULL) {
> /* make sure we don't repeat the search path */
> if (inpath(tok))
> continue;
hmm, a repetitive assignment like "tmp = NULL" as the increment
expression of the for-loop doesn't read too natural for me either.
;-)
Have a nice day,
Berny--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
