Re: adopting lslk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:54:45PM +0100, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> I just noticed this big fat message from the lslk(8) manpage:
> 
>  Revision 1.29 represents the end of life for lslk.  I don't have time
>  to support it.  Please don't report bugs to me.  I will politely  
>  decline to work on them.                                         

 Yes, I know, I'm maintainer of the package in Red Hat :-)

> I was thinking util-linux might be a good place to continue maintaining

 I agree.

> this program, it seems worthwhile. I couldn't find the _official_ source
> tarball but I got it through apt. I could integrate it and send a patch.
> Any thoughts?

 Yes, but please clean up the code, add xalloc, err.h, long options,
 etc... you know ;-) May be it would be also nice to use lib/tt.c for
 output to make it compatible with our new utils.

    Karel


-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux