Re: [PATCH 0/5] losetup: rewrite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 04:49:49PM -0300, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Instead of a complete rewrite from scratch, like it was initially
> planned, its better to do it incrementally, which makes it easier to
> regression test.

 I agree, do it incrementally is better for review. Anyway for merge
 into master branch we need all changes.

 Suggestion:

  1. use directly lib/loopdev.c stuff in mount.c and umount.c 

     -- I did this yesterday. So you don't have to fight with 
        unreadable spaghetti in mount.c (check_loop() is hell)...


  2. remove obsolete things (e.g. #ifdef !MAIN)

  3. remove code around old non-64bit ioctls

  4. remove lomount.h and loop.h (include/loopdev.h has to be enough)

  5. move mount/lomount.c to sys-utils/losetup.c

  6. use lib/loopdev.c stuff in sys-utils/losetup.c

     - it should be possible to initialize one struct loopdev_cxt in main() and
       use it in all operations

     - rather than many variables (capacity, find, all, showdev,
       assoc, delete, ...) use any enum for requested operation and
       switch(command) as a core of the main().



    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux