Re: [PATCH 00/11] various lscpu changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:07:57AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 02:52:51AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > another set of patches against lscpu. Since you didn't have chance to push
> > out your local tree to kernel.org yet, I simply based them on my old lscpu
> > branch which you applied on your local tree:
> 
>  Merged (available on github) with some minor changes. I have also
>  added --online to disable by default enabled --all for -e.

I wouldn't say that were minor changes :) But the result looks much better
than my code. Thanks!

However I'd like to see one change if you don't object: printing just "N" or
"Y" instead of "No" and "Yes" in the human readable output looks a bit ugly
to me:

[root@r35lp37 sys-utils]# ./lscpu -e
CPU BOOK SOCKET CORE ONLINE CONFIGURED POLARIZATION ADDRESS
0   0    0      0    Y      Y          horizontal   0
1   -    -      -    N      N          -            1
2   0    0      2    Y      Y          horizontal   2
3   0    1      3    Y      Y          horizontal   3
4   0    1      4    Y      Y          horizontal   4
5   0    1      5    Y      Y          horizontal   5
6   0    1      6    Y      Y          horizontal   6
7   0    2      7    Y      Y          horizontal   7
8   0    2      8    Y      Y          horizontal   8
9   0    2      9    Y      Y          horizontal   9
10  0    3      10   Y      Y          horizontal   10
11  0    3      11   Y      Y          horizontal   11
12  0    3      12   Y      Y          horizontal   12
13  0    4      13   Y      Y          horizontal   13
14  0    4      14   Y      Y          horizontal   14
15  0    5      15   Y      Y          horizontal   15
16  1    6      16   Y      Y          horizontal   16
17  1    7      17   Y      Y          horizontal   17
18  1    7      18   Y      Y          horizontal   18
19  1    7      19   Y      Y          horizontal   19

Comparing that to the long form:

CPU BOOK SOCKET CORE ONLINE CONFIGURED POLARIZATION ADDRESS
0   0    0      0    Yes    Yes        horizontal   0
1   -    -      -    No     No         -            1
2   0    0      1    Yes    Yes        horizontal   2
3   0    1      2    Yes    Yes        horizontal   3
4   0    1      3    Yes    Yes        horizontal   4
5   0    1      4    Yes    Yes        horizontal   5
6   0    1      5    Yes    Yes        horizontal   6
7   0    2      6    Yes    Yes        horizontal   7
8   0    2      7    Yes    Yes        horizontal   8
9   0    2      8    Yes    Yes        horizontal   9
10  0    3      9    Yes    Yes        horizontal   10
11  0    3      10   Yes    Yes        horizontal   11
12  0    3      11   Yes    Yes        horizontal   12
13  0    4      12   Yes    Yes        horizontal   13
14  0    4      13   Yes    Yes        horizontal   14
15  0    5      14   Yes    Yes        horizontal   15
16  1    6      15   Yes    Yes        horizontal   16
17  1    7      16   Yes    Yes        horizontal   17
18  1    7      17   Yes    Yes        horizontal   18
19  1    7      18   Yes    Yes        horizontal   19

I'd prefer the long form. What do you think?

diff --git a/sys-utils/lscpu.c b/sys-utils/lscpu.c
index 601c872..6a37bb3 100644
--- a/sys-utils/lscpu.c
+++ b/sys-utils/lscpu.c
@@ -995,13 +995,24 @@ get_cell_data(struct lscpu_desc *desc, int cpu, int col,
 			snprintf(buf, bufsz, "%d", desc->addresses[cpu]);
 		break;
 	case COL_CONFIGURED:
-		if (desc->configured)
+		if (!desc->configured)
+			break;
+		if (mod->mode == OUTPUT_PARSABLE)
 			snprintf(buf, bufsz,
 				 desc->configured[cpu] ? _("Y") : _("N"));
+		else
+			snprintf(buf, bufsz,
+				 desc->configured[cpu] ? _("Yes") : _("No"));
 		break;
 	case COL_ONLINE:
-		if (desc->online)
-			snprintf(buf, bufsz, is_cpu_online(desc, cpu) ? _("Y") : _("N"));
+		if (!desc->online)
+			break;
+		if (mod->mode == OUTPUT_PARSABLE)
+			snprintf(buf, bufsz,
+				 is_cpu_online(desc, cpu) ? _("Y") : _("N"));
+		else
+			snprintf(buf, bufsz,
+				 is_cpu_online(desc, cpu) ? _("Yes") : _("No"));
 		break;
 	}
 	return buf;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux