On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:28:17PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:06:41PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > Do you think it would be ok to have it in util-linux? Or should it live
> > somewhere else?
>
> It makes sense to have it in util-linux. I'm going to merge it after
> v2.20 release.
Ok, great!
I set up a chcpu git branch where you could pull the chcpu stuff easily:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/heiko/util-linux.git chcpu
It contains just the two patches posted here and doesn't interfer with the
lscpu branch that is also there.
Heiko Carstens (2):
cpuset: add option to allow cpulist_parse() to fail
chcpu: new tool
include/cpuset.h | 2 +-
lib/cpuset.c | 7 +-
schedutils/taskset.c | 2 +-
sys-utils/.gitignore | 1 +
sys-utils/Makefile.am | 3 +
sys-utils/chcpu.1 | 94 ++++++++++++++
sys-utils/chcpu.c | 337 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
sys-utils/lscpu.1 | 2 +
sys-utils/lscpu.c | 2 +-
9 files changed, 445 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 sys-utils/chcpu.1
create mode 100644 sys-utils/chcpu.c
> > +static int path_exist(const char *path, ...)
>
> It seems that we need to move the path_*() functions from lscpu(1) to
> lib/ and hare the stuff.
Yes, I thought so as well. But laziness won ;)
Thanks,
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
