Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib/procutils: general purpose procfs parsing functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:20:22AM -0300, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:02 +0200, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> > Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > +struct proc_tasks *proc_open_tasks(pid_t pid)
> > +{
> > +	struct proc_tasks *tasks;
> > +	char path[PATH_MAX];
> > +	
> > +	sprintf(path, "/proc/%d/task/", pid);
> > +
> > +	tasks = malloc(sizeof(struct proc_tasks));
> > +	if (!tasks)
> > +		return NULL;
> > +
> > +	tasks->dir = opendir(path);
> > +	if (!tasks->dir)
> > +		return NULL;
> > +
> > +	return tasks;
> > +}
> > 
> > shouldn't tasks be freed if opendir fails?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > +{
> > +	int i = 0;
> > 
> > warning: unused variable 'i'
> 
> And yes.
> 
> Karel, would you rather have me resend a patch with these fixes or do it
> yourself before applying (if you do such a thing)?

 Fixed & Applied.

 I have also a little changed proc_next_tid() to return 1 at the
 end of the directory, so -1 means error only.

 Thanks!

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux