On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:14:30AM +0100, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> i sent the patch below ~10 days ago and did not receive any feedback
> whatsoever. if it's wrong or deemed unneeded, i'd really like to hear
> your opinion why. thanks!
I'm still not sure if mount(8) is the right place to fix odd kernel
behaviour. Anyway, your patch seems like a usable workaround.
I'll try to apply the patch later (it will necessary to modify
libmount, because the library is not able to add a new entry to mtab
for MS_REMOUNT requests).
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
