On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 03:36:26PM +0100, Sami Kerola wrote: > See attachment for fixed patch; it is less intrusive. Applied, thanks. > I realized I am not good enough in python to do fixes as complex I > tried initially. IMHO you're trying to change too many things in one patch. Try smaller patches rather than one huge. For example: > Usage output screen got to be completely rewrote. Aim is to 1.patch > assist user to determe which switches to use without reading > manual page. The change also introduced new option to see command > version. 2.patch > Determination if the executable name is `page' is now easy to see > in source, and effect of using the name is mentioned in manual > page. 3.patch > Rest of the change is trivial; exit values to compiler warning 4.patch > removals, magic constants to preprocessor definitions, 5.patch > symbolic exit values, comment pretty printing and #endif markups. 6.patch .. so next time 6 patches rather than 1 huge ;-) Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> http://karelzak.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html