Davidlohr Bueso, le Mon 31 Jan 2011 09:02:24 -0300, a écrit :
> On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 01:25 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/fsck/fsck.c b/fsck/fsck.c
> > index 87f8210..e8f433e 100644
> > --- a/fsck/fsck.c
> > +++ b/fsck/fsck.c
> > @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static dev_t get_disk(const char *device)
> >
> > static int is_irrotational_disk(dev_t disk)
> > {
> > - char path[PATH_MAX];
> > + char path[33+2*11+1];
> > FILE *f;
> > int rc, x;
> >
> > @@ -1034,7 +1034,7 @@ static int count_slaves(dev_t disk)
> > {
> > DIR *dir;
> > struct dirent *dp;
> > - char dirname[PATH_MAX];
> > + char dirname[24+2*11+1];
>
> That's just plain ugly,
Well, not so much more ugly than allocating 4096 bytes (or whatever the
value PATH_MAX is)...
> does Hurd not have it?
It does not, since there is no such limitation.
> why not redefine PATH_MAX?
>
> #ifndef PATH_MAX
> #define PATH_MAX 24+2*11+1
> #endif
Because that would be too small for the first case.
Samuel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
