On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:05:24PM +1030, Graham Gower wrote:
> Hi,
>
> uClibc may be built without large file support (no llseek, lseek64, etc).
>
> The below patch fixes things for me in this case. Patch is against 2.17,
> but it doesn't look like the code has changed recently.
>
> -Graham
>
> --- util-linux-ng-2.17/shlibs/blkid/src/llseek.c.orig 2010-11-29 11:31:49.000000000 +1030
> +++ util-linux-ng-2.17/shlibs/blkid/src/llseek.c 2010-11-29 11:52:07.000000000 +1030
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>
> #include "blkidP.h"
>
> -#ifdef __linux__
> +#if defined(__linux__) && !(defined(__UCLIBC__) && !defined(__USE_FILE_OFFSET64))
Not sure...
> #if defined(HAVE_LSEEK64) && defined(HAVE_LSEEK64_PROTOTYPE) || defined(__UCLIBC__)
... wouldn't be enough to use:
#if defined(HAVE_LSEEK64) && defined(HAVE_LSEEK64_PROTOTYPE) || \
defined(__UCLIBC__) && defined(__USE_FILE_OFFSET64)
?
The code inside __linux__ conditional block seems useful
independently on libc, it calls llseek syscall directly.
Unfortunately, I don't have uClib to test it. Mike, any comment?
I'm not sure if we still need llseek.c at all -- it should
be enough to follow standard system headers in year 2010...
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
